INTERIM vs. CONSULTANTS

IM recommends a   route, achieves the required agreements, and proposes
changes,  including the implementation of needed solutions. Their
practical experience and their proven expertise are essential for this. They achieve
the necessary agreements and face changes and even implements the necessary solutions

An IM normally works in one project at a time with   full time commitment,
they  may  however in occasions do it on a “Part time basis” if it is more convenient
for   the client, their contributions are  generally  “full mind” in the  tasks assigned
Though in occasions, a " part –time” solution could be the best for the company,
their full mind contribution in the assigned topics and  contained in required urgencies.

The CONSULTANTS on the other hand ( because the nature of their role) tend to
recommend a fan  of alternatives and lets  the client decide   and implement  some of
the proposals. In general they are in depth  experts in analying theory and technology, but
they are not committed   to prioritize   the practical experience of  an accountable and
functional manager. They are as a rule more expensive, and they   work in several projects
and problems simultaneously.

CONSULTANTS are  normally independent advisers with a  significant professional
experience.  Generally  they work provoking “brain storms” and discussions of ideas
that guide the executive Team, but they do not execute  and implement the
proposed solutions. They are not “accountable”.

For the selection and appointment of IM,   Armoni Sothern Cone / Ray& Berndtson adheres  to the  rigorous
Quality standards maintained during our 44 years of experience  in the Hunting,
Selection and evaluation of Executives for the  region, plus the “know-how”
provided by our global  international colleagues.

Our must is to find the best INTERIM EXPERTS in total accordance with the required profile, need and urgency of our clients.